Birmingham City Council (21 017 051)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complains the Council has increased its charge for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for driving in the Clean Air Zone (CAZ) when she did not receive the earlier correspondence for the PCN. She also says she has been told she is no longer able to appeal the PCN with the Council. This has caused her upset and worry.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss Y’s challenge to the PCN is a matter for the appeals process. Miss Y has a right to appeal, to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. However, if she is outside the time frame for this, she can apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) to make a late witness statement. She can explain as part of her late witness statement that she did not receive the earlier correspondence and why she may have been prevented from appealing sooner.
  2. If the TEC accepts Miss Y’s application it can take the process back to an earlier stage, reducing the amount of the PCN and reinstating Miss Y’s right of appeal against it.
  3. This is often free in the initial stages and reasonable adjustments can be made where necessary for access to the service. Consequently, it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to use her right to appeal. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings