What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Havering (21 015 138)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices. This is because Mr Y has used his right to appeal so we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Miss X, acting on behalf of Mr Y, complains the Council has pursued Mr Y for charges relating to a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) despite Mr Y not receiving the earlier correspondence such as the Notice to Owner.
  2. Miss X says this has caused Mr Y financial difficulty, upset and anxiety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued a PCN to Mr Y in November 2020. Mr Y appealed this in November but did not then receive a response. Mr Y says he also did not receive a Notice to Owner. In May 2021 Mr Y, with the assistance of Miss X, submitted witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), which is part of Northampton County Court.
  2. The costs of the fine have since increased. Miss X says a late witness statement was submitted to the TEC in November 2021. Mr Y then paid £483 to an enforcement agent acting on behalf of the Council to avoid further charges or recovery action. Miss X then approached us in January 2022.

Analysis

  1. As Mr Y, or Miss X on his behalf, have applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre under a late witness statement, they have begun their right of appeal. If the TEC accepts Mr Y’s application it can take the process back to an earlier stage, reducing the amount of the PCN and reinstating Ms Y’s right of appeal against it. It can also ask the Council to refund the money paid, including any fees for the enforcement agent.
  2. If successful in the application to the TEC, Mr Y may be able to appeal to the London Tribunals. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London. This is often free in the initial stages and reasonable adjustments can be made where necessary for access to the service.
  3. However, as Mr Y has used his right to appeal to the TEC, we cannot investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because Mr Y has used his right to appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings