Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (21 006 806)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council is pursuing an old penalty charge notice debt and that its enforcement agent caused distress. Ms X is challenging the debt recovery order at the Traffic Enforcement Centre

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council’s enforcement agent contacted her this year about an unpaid penalty charge notice debt. She says he threatened to gain entry and take goods to cover the debt, did not listen to her, and did not believe what she told him about her situation. Ms X says she did not know about the penalty charge notice, issued in 2019, because she moved. Ms X says the enforcement agent caused her anxiety and distress. She wants the Council to deal with the matter and cancel the enforcement fees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Ms X’s information and comments and discussed the complaint with her by telephone.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Ms X’s complaint for the following reasons:
  2. Ms X has challenged the debt recovery order at the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) which is part of the county court. If the decision goes in her favour the recovery order will be cancelled. The Council will write to her and explain the position. If the decision goes against her she can request a Judge review the TEC decision. It is reasonable for Ms X to follow this procedure.
  3. It is good practice for a council to place recovery action on hold pending the outcome of the TEC procedure. If Ms X has hardship or difficulty paying the debt she can ask the Council or its enforcement agent to consider a payment plan. If it refuses to do so she can complain to the Council. If the Council fails to deal with her complaint or she is not happy with the outcome she may complain to this office.
  4. There is insufficient injustice to investigate Ms X’s telephone conversations with the Council’s enforcement agent.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council is pursuing an old penalty charge notice debt and that its enforcement agent caused distress. Ms X is challenging the debt recovery order at the Traffic Enforcement Centre

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings