Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (20 008 583)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for a parking contravention. The complainant has appealed against the penalty charge notice to a statutory tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr C, has complained about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council for a parking contravention. Mr C says the Council should accept the fee for parking and not pursue him for a debt.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. It says we cannot investigate a complaint when someone has appealed to a statutory tribunal; we have no discretion in this. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Courts have decided that we cannot investigate a complaint about any action by a council, concerning a matter which is itself out of our jurisdiction. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr C said in his complaint and background information provided by the Council. I have also seen the public register of appeals provided by London Tribunals.

Back to top

What I found

Background

  1. The Council enforces parking restrictions and takes recovery action using procedures set out in the Traffic Management Act 2004 and associated Regulations. The Council and motorists must follow these procedures.

Summary of events

  1. The Council issued a penalty charge notice in February 2020 because it believed he had parked without displaying the necessary permit.
  2. Mr C challenged the penalty charge notice. After the Council rejected his representations, he appealed to London Tribunals. This is a statutory tribunal and its decisions are legally binding on both parties.
  3. In August 2020 London Tribunals refused Mr C’s appeal and directed him to pay £130 within 28 days. Because Mr C did not pay, the Council has continued taking recovery action in accordance with the regulations.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because Mr C has appealed to a statutory tribunal.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings