Mole Valley District Council (19 019 209)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Feb 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a parking fine as it is reasonable to expect him to have appealed against it. The complaint is therefore outside the Ombudsman’s legal remit.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a parking fine he received after he was unable to buy a ticket from the Council’s ticket machine.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr X said in his complaint and background information the Council sent to me. I have written to Mr X with my draft decision and considered his comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X complains about receiving a parking fine from the Council. Mr X says he was unable to buy a ticket from the Council’s ticket machine as he had no coins, but he did buy a ticket from an adjacent machine. Mr X paid the fine to avoid further action as he was going on holiday. Mr X has since continued to challenge the fine as he considers the signage in the car park is misleading. Mr X wants this to be addressed.
  2. The Council explains the car park is shared with a supermarket and Mr X bought his ticket from a ticket machine for the supermarket’s car park.
  3. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT) is the independent tribunal which hears appeals against parking fines issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004. This Act sets out a statutory appeal process for motorists.

Assessment

  1. Mr X had the right to appeal against the fine to the TPT. It would have considered Mr X’s case that the signage at the car park is misleading. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to have done this and so the complaint is outside our legal remit and we will not investigate. That Mr X chose to pay the fine and so halt the appeal process does not affect this view.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. My decision is that the Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X had the right to appeal against the fine and it is reasonable to have expected him to do so. The complaint is therefore outside the Ombudsman’s legal remit.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings