London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (26 006 029)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled the implementation and construction of a cycleway. This is because we have decided any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to follow correct processes when implementing a new cycleway near to where he lives. He says the Council did not make decisions in a transparent manner and documents have not been made available. Mr X also says terminology used for the cycleway is misleading. Mr X says this has caused him injustice because he no longer feels safe using the route as both a cyclist and a motorist. He also says he has spent avoidable time trouble and expense in challenging the Council about the matter over several years.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. People may complain to us about injustice caused by:
    • ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ by a public organisation we could investigate; or
    • the actions of an organisation in connection with privately arranged adult social care.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(1) or section 34C(1)(a)).

  1. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), or section 34B(8)).
  2. We will not normally investigate complaint handling if we are not investigating the rest of the complaint. This is because there is not usually enough injustice to justify us doing so. We collect information about particularly poor complaint handling practice and report this back to organisations. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), or section 34B(8)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law means we can choose only to investigate a complaint where the person has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by the body complained about. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
  2. I recognise the circumstances of Mr X’s complaint have affected him, but this is not significant enough to warrant us investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings