What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Westminster City Council (26 005 603)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing Mr X with a fixed penalty notice for breaching the terms of a Public Spaces Protection Order. A fixed penalty is a criminal matter and the courts are better placed to decide if the notice was reasonably issued.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says he was issued with a fixed penalty (FPN) under the Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 for activity involving a pedicab in a restricted are. He says the officers involved did not properly identify themselves and that the address to which the notice was served was his previous address. He believes the notice is invalid for these reasons.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X was issued with a fixed penalty notice for breaching the terms of a Public Spaces Protection Order. He says the officers failed to carry proper identification showing their surnames. He also says that the notice was issued to his old address and that the Council should have updated its data about him.
  2. The Council disputes Mr X’s claims and dealt with his complaint about the penalty. It says the authorised officers identified themselves and surnames are not included for GDPR data protection reasons. The Council also says that that address was provided by Police officers who attended the scene and that it has issued previous FPN’s to Mr X at this address.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because it concerns a criminal matter. Mr X says that he has sufficient evidence to defend any action at the magistrates court and it is for the Council to decide whether it wishes to test the validity of the notice in court. We cannot advise Mr X about what action he should take on this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing Mr X with a fixed penalty notice for breaching the terms of a Public Spaces Protection Order. A fixed penalty is a criminal matter and the courts are better placed to decide if the notice was reasonably issued.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings