Leicestershire County Council (25 025 953)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of reports of unauthorised flags on lampposts in her area. This is because the issue has not caused her significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has failed to properly consider whether to remove St George’s and Union flags from public lampposts. She says the Council made its decision without carrying out an equality impact assessment despite how they may be viewed by asylum seekers and people from ethnic minority backgrounds. She says the flags create an exclusionary and intimidating atmosphere which affects her sense of safety, belonging and wellbeing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. I appreciate Ms X feels uncomfortable about the flags and is concerned about the impact they may have on others, but she has not provided consent to bring the complaint for anyone other than herself and the injustice she describes is not significant enough to warrant investigation.
  3. In any event, it is not for us to decide whether the Council has met its obligations under the Equality Act 2010. This is a matter for the courts. The Council has told Ms X it is satisfied its approach complies with its responsibilities under the Act and we cannot say otherwise.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the matter does not cause significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings