Buckinghamshire Council (25 019 323)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the location of a streetlight. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council decided a streetlight doesn’t obstruct the use of his driveway. He says he disagrees with the Council’s safety inspection and says the Council incorrectly applied the law.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the placement of a streetlamp makes it difficult to leave his driveway safely.
  2. The Council inspected the streetlamp and decided it does not obscure the field of vision or cause a safety issue that required the streetlamp to be moved. The Council did identify obstruction provided by vegetation and said it would prune it back.
  3. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation has followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, even if someone disagrees with it.
  4. I have considered the guidance on carrying out visibility spays, which includes what would count as an obstruction or not and am satisfied with the Council’s assessment of the streetlight. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council’s processes here to justify investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings