Staffordshire County Council (25 015 149)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to flags appearing in public spaces. This has not caused Mr X significant enough injustice to warrant us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council not removing flags from street lighting columns and other public spaces. He says this means he feels unsafe going out in his community as he believes those who put them up have weaponised them, and it has affected his health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault, or any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In Mr X’s area people have attached flags to lighting columns. The Council said it would not remove them as the specific flags are not unauthorised on Council-owned property, it did not consider them dangerous to road users or pedestrians, and it has no power to remove flags from private property or that of other councils.
  2. There is no duty in law on the Council to remove items attached to lighting columns or other street furniture. We could not therefore say removing them or leaving them in place amounts to fault by a council.
  3. I recognise Mr X may find the flags distressing, but there is nothing inherently offensive in the use of a national flag or some other widely recognised flags. It is not for the Ombudsman to reach a judgement about the significance of a particular flag. This means any distress Mr X may experience from seeing the flags is not a significant enough injustice to warrant the Ombudsman using time and public money to investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is neither enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision nor of it causing Mr X significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings