Oxfordshire County Council (25 013 359)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint that she suffered injuries after tripping on a defective pavement. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs B to pursue her compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B says she tripped and suffered injuries due to the Council’s failure to fix a defective pavement. Mrs B says the incident caused her considerable pain and distress and she had to pay over £5,000 for the required dental work.
  2. Mrs B complains the Council has refused her compensation claim and told her wrong information about when it repaired this pavement after the incident.
  3. Mrs B would like the Council to apologise and pay her compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not normally investigate personal injury complaints. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.
  2. Mrs B has received the Council’s decision on her compensation claim. Mrs B may now pursue her claim by taking the Council to court.
  3. Only the courts can decide if the Council was negligent, and if so, make an order for damages. We cannot recommend actions or payments that ‘punish’ an organisation. Because of the impact of the incident on Mrs B and the significant costs she has incurred, I find it is reasonable and proportionate for Mrs B to pursue her claim at court.
  4. Because we are not investigating the substantive matter, an investigation solely into the information the Council provided to Mrs B would not be a good use of our limited resources or achieve a meaningful outcome for Mrs B.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings