Birmingham City Council (24 023 024)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with resident’s concerns about vehicles connected to a local business obstructing the road. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome and no worthwhile outcome is achievable by our investigation. We are also satisfied with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains on behalf of local residents that a business is using local roads to park construction vehicles and is storing materials on the pavement. She says that residents are worried about their safety and the debris from the vehicles are spreading on roads and pavements. Ms X wants the Council to take enforcement action to stop the construction vehicles parking on the nearby roads.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and s34H(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the representative and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has confirmed that since it responded to the resident’s complaint it has investigated the issue and taken enforcement action against the business.
  2. The Council says it checked the area on 25 June 2025 and it was clear. The Council withdrew the Court Order the next day.
  3. The Council says it has not received reports of any further concerns since. However, if residents experience further problems these can be directed to its highways team.
  4. I am satisfied the Council took the appropriate enforcement action to address the issues raised.
  5. I consider an investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve anything further to add to the Council’s response or achieve a worthwhile outcome for the complainants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome and no worthwhile outcome is achievable by our investigation. We are also satisfied with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings