Sheffield City Council (24 014 489)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to investigate the source of water flooding on the highway outside the complainant’s house. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Councils actions. The water originates from private property. The Council is not responsible for carrying out investigation works on private property and we cannot require it to carry out such an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council failed to respond to her concerns about its requirement that she acts to stop water flowing from her property onto the highway. She wants an investigation carried out to establish the source of the water and who is responsible for repairs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X became aware of a problem with water flowing onto the public highway outside her home. She contacted the local water authority who investigated and concluded it was a ground water issue under the pavement. They advised her to contact the Council.
  2. Ms X commissioned an investigation. The investigator’s report says it is ‘inconclusive if the stream of water is from a water supply leak at a neighbouring property or from saturated ground.’
  3. Ms X says the Council failed to respond to her concerns. She therefore made a complaint.
  4. The Council’s stage one response confirmed the water originates from private land, not the public highway. Therefore the Council says it is not responsible for remedial work which is the responsibility of the property owner.
  5. Ms X escalated her complaint. The Council confirmed the water is not a leak, it is ground water rising from private property. It told Ms X it will not investigate and excavate on private land to establish the source or the water. As it has a duty to keep the highway safe, it wrote to Ms X requesting that she act to prevent water discharging onto the highway outside her home.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s action. It is not responsible for investigating the source of the water as it is coming from private ground.
  2. We cannot require it to investigate or carry out remedial works on private property.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings