Transport for London (23 015 716)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the authority giving inaccurate information about travel pass cards in London. There is insufficient evidence of any significant injustice which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complaint about a Transport for London advice centre giving her inaccurate information about travel passes in the capital. She says she was advised to purchase a Travelcard rather than an Oyster Card which resulted in her spending £28.40 more than if she had been advised to purchase the latter card.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X says she contacted the authority from Heathrow airport when arriving in the country to enquire about travel cards for London centre. She says she was advised to buy a Travelcard which she did. She subsequently found that if she had been advised to buy an Oyster Card, she would have saved £28.40 from her journeys. She believes she was misled by the advisor and should be compensated.
  2. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter. In this case the amount which Mrs X says she spent does not meet the level which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the authority giving inaccurate information about travel pass cards in London. There is insufficient evidence of any significant injustice which would warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings