Worcestershire County Council (22 016 661)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to the complainant’s fence. It is reasonable for the complainant to ask the courts to decide whether the Council is liable for the damage.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mrs X, is represented by her daughter, I shall call Mrs Y.
  2. Mrs Y says the Council cut down shrubs and bushes on the other side of Mrs X’s boundary fence. She says this has left Mrs X’s property exposed. Also, the fence is damaged because the shrubs have been leaning on it for more than 30 years. Mrs Y wants the Council to pay for repairs to the fence.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mrs Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has a statutory responsibility to maintain the highways in its area, including footpaths. The Council says a Councillor asked it to clear the footpath following complaints about overgrowth from residents.
  2. The Council does not have to consult or tell residents it will be carrying out such work unless access to their properties will be affected.
  3. We do not normally investigate complaints about damage to property. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent.
  4. Deciding whether an organisation has been negligent usually involves looking rigorously, and in a structured way, at evidence as only the court can to make its findings. In addition, only a court can decide if an organisation has been negligent and so should pay damages. We cannot recommend actions or payments that ‘punish’ the organisation.
  5. We cannot decide whether the Council has been negligent and damaged Mrs X’s fence. We cannot enforce an award of damages. So, I would usually expect someone in Mrs X’s position to seek a remedy in the courts, directly or through her home insurer.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because we cannot decide if the Council is liable for damage to Mrs X’s fence. It is reasonable to expect her to ask the small claims court to consider her claim.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings