Birmingham City Council (22 003 598)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s delay in installing her dropped kerb. This is because the matter has not caused Mrs X significant injustice and it is unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for her.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council has failed to install a dropped kerb at her property despite having paid for the work to be carried out nearly four months ago.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. I understand Mrs X is frustrated with the Council’s delay and its failure to provide a date for the work but the injustice she claims is not significant enough to warrant further investigation. It is also unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mrs X as the Council clearly does not have the capacity to meet the current level of demand and we could not reasonably say it must prioritise Mrs X's case over others which may have been waiting for longer.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council’s delay has not caused Mrs X significant injustice and it is unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for her in any event.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings