Nottinghamshire County Council (21 017 805)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council accusing the complainant of obstructing highway land. The Council has apologised for its error and confirmed it has corrected its records. Further investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr B says the Council failed to consult him before sending a letter requiring him to remove a fence and buildings which it believed were within the adopted highway.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. On receiving the letter from the Council, Mr B says he provided further evidence to Officers who attended a meeting at his home. Following this meeting the Council confirmed it made further checks. It told Mr B its highway adoption record was wrong. It apologised for this error and confirmed its records have been corrected.
  2. I understand Mr B found this matter distressing and wants to know what information the Council considered before writing to him. He is concerned about what would have happened if he had not provided more evidence. However, the Council has apologised for the error and corrected its records. No further action was taken. I consider that it would not be a good use of public funds to investigate further when this is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we believe further investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings