Birmingham City Council (21 013 099)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to a car in a car park where the CCTV was not working. This is because it is reasonable for the complainant to use the legal remedy available.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained on behalf of her father (Mr X) whose car was damaged by an unknown third party when it was parked in a council operated car park. Miss X has asked the Council for CCTV footage to help with an insurance claim, but the CCTV system was not working. Miss X says Mr X would not have parked there if he had known this. The Council has refused to pay for the damage to Mr X’s car.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s claim is that the Council should pay for the damage to Mr X’s car because it was negligent. Only the courts can decide claims of negligence. Now the Council has refused a claim for damages, it is open to Miss X and her father to make a claim in court. The court can decide if the Council has been negligent and what damages, if any, it should pay. These are not decisions the Ombudsman can take. It is therefore reasonable for Miss X, and her father, to use the legal remedy available.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable for the complainant to use the legal remedy available.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings