City of Doncaster Council (21 005 893)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not responding to the complainant’s concerns about issues arising from cable laying outside his home. This is because the injustice he claims is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains he did not receive a response from the Council about issues arising from cable laying in the road outside his home. He says this has caused him frustration and he would like a response to the points he raised.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’.
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if, for example, we believe any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Two private communication companies laid cables in the road where Mr X lives. In January 2021 he contacted his local councillor about damage to the grass verge and paving slabs outside of his property caused by the second cable works. Mr X was also concerned that cable work was carried out on two separate occasions which he felt was unnecessary.
  2. The company that carried out the second works responded to Mr X directly in January 2021.
  3. Mr X’s councillor asked Council officers for an update on the remedial works in April, June and July 2021. Officers responded on each occasion explaining the communication company would complete the work but it could not provide a timescale.
  4. The Council has confirmed the remedial work is now complete and it has discussed the matter with Mr X directly.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because any injustice caused by a lack of direct response from the Council is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings