Kingston Upon Hull City Council (20 009 642)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Feb 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s failure to accept liability for injuries which she suffered when she fell on an uneven pavement. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to seek a remedy in the courts if her claim against the Council’s insurers is unsuccessful.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X made a claim against the Council after she fell on an uneven pavement and suffered personal injury. She says the Council carried out repairs the following day, but it will not accept liability for the accident.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mrs X submitted with her complaint. I have also considered the Council’s response. Mrs X has been given an opportunity to comment on a draft copy of my decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X suffered injuries when she fell on a defective paving stone. She reported the incident and the Council sent workers to repair the pavement the following day. She says that this was an admission that the pavement was unsafe and that it should pay her compensation.
  2. The Council sent her claim to its insurers who contacted her and said they did not believe the Council was liable. The works to the footway were carried out because the highway authority has a defence under section 58 of the Highways Act 1980 when an unreported defect causes an incident. Once reported the defect has to be dealt with in order to prevent further claims arising for which there would be no defence.
  3. If the insurers do not accept liability, then it would be for Mrs X to take the matter to the small claims court. The Ombudsman cannot determine legal claims for negligence and only the courts can decide if a party is liable in tort.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to seek a remedy in the courts if her claim against the Council’s insurers is unsuccessful.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings