Cheshire East Council (26 009 905)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a claim for damage to Mr X’s motor vehicle. Mr X has an alternative legal remedy, to pursue a claim of negligence through the courts.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not accept his claim for damages to his vehicle, caused by a pothole.
  2. Mr X also complains the Council failed to provide explanations or consider his complaint.
  3. Mr X says this caused distress and frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. Negligence claims and interpreting the law around civil liability are generally best decided by a court where the Council does not accept insurance liability. Only a court can decide whether the problem should have been dealt with by the Council before it caused damage to a person’s property, or if it is liable to pay damages for a person’s loss.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X claimed for damages after his vehicle was damaged by a pothole. The Council refused to accept Mr X’s claim for damages.
  2. Mr X complained to the Council, but it refused the complaint. This was because the Council said the matter could be taken to court.
  3. As outlined in paragraph four, we will not usually investigate where a person can take the matter to court.
  4. It would be reasonable for Mr X to take this to court because only the court can decide if the Council was negligent and whether it should pay Mr X’s damages.
  5. As we will not investigate the substantive matters of the complaint, we will not investigate the Council’s communication or handling of the complaint because it is not proportionate to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to seek a remedy through the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings