Northumberland County Council (26 004 929)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to a car. This is because it is reasonable to expect the complainant to go to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X, who is represented by Miss Y, complains about the actions of the Council when they reported a pothole had damaged Mr X’s car. Miss Y seeks reimbursement for the cost of Mr X’s replacement tyre.
  2. Miss Y also says the Council failed to repair the pothole despite it being reported on three occasions before it damaged Mr X’s car.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has investigated Miss Y’s complaint. It says the ‘defect’ was assessed, a 14‑day repair timescale was assigned in accordance with policy, and additional reports did not alter the assessed risk. The Council states its records show the repair was completed before it is alleged to have damaged Mr X’s car. It denies liability for the damage to Mr X’s car.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because Miss Y can take her claim for damages to court and it is reasonable to expect her to do this. Only the courts can decide whether the Council has maintained the highway properly or is liable for any damage to property due to a failure to repair the highway. The law also gives the Council the right to defend in court against any claims. It is therefore reasonable for Miss Y to go to court and so I will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to go to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings