Durham County Council (26 003 112)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his compensation claim. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take his claim to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council's handling of a claim for compensation. Mr X says his car was damaged after he drove over a pothole on a Council road.
  2. Mr X also disputes a Council assertion that its inspection schedule found no defects on the road. He wants the Council to reimburse his repair costs of £300.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s responses to Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has responded to Mr X. It declines any liability for damage to his car. It also says it had a reasonable system of inspection and repair in place, had received no reports of the defect before the incident, and therefore did not consider itself negligent under its duties as highway authority. The Council advises Mr X to seek independent legal advice if he wished to pursue the matter further
  2. We will not investigate. The core issue is whether the Council was negligent in maintaining the highway and whether its inspection regime was adequate. The law provides a remedy for such disputes through the courts, where liability, negligence, the adequacy of inspections and the reliability of evidence can be tested.
  3. It is therefore reasonable to expect Mr X to go to court. Only the courts can decide legally if the Council has maintained the highway properly or is liable for any damages due to a failure to repair the highway. The Ombudsman has no powers to compel the Council to reimburse Mr X.
  4. Finally, it is not a proportionate use of our resources to investigate the Council’s complaint/claim handling when we are not investigating the core complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X ’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to go to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings