Leicester City Council (25 028 977)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about defective drain. This is because the complaint is late and Mr X can take the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council has failed to deal with an ineffective drain in his road for three years. This has led to flooding, and he believes it is causing damage to his foundations. He wants the Council to prioritise the repair and complete it as a soon as possible.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).
  3. We cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council regarding the matters in paragraph 1.
  2. The Council replied in January 2026 that it had inspected the drain. It agreed it was damaged. It said it had added the drain to its list and planned to repair within the financial year. However, it said it could not give a definite date.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because it is late, as Mr X was aware of the issue more than 12 months before he complained to the Ombudsman. There are no good reasons for the delay.
  4. Mr X believes the Council is negligent and this has caused damage to his home. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if necessary, the courts.
  5. We will not investigate Mr X’s claim that the Council’s delay has caused damage to his home. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to seek a remedy by taking the Council to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late. In addition, we will not investigate because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings