What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Essex County Council (25 025 201)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about design and safety flaws, relating to a road traffic scheme the Council is responsible for. There is no significant injustice to X.

The complaint

  1. X complained the Council, as a Highways Authority, had not done enough to rectify design and safety flaws, relating to a road traffic scheme. X was concerned the resulting scheme meant there was a greater risk of hazard, to wheelchair users, pedestrians and cyclists. X was also concerned the Council may be found liable and may have to pay compensation, should a person be injured consequently.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. X complained to the Council, unhappy with several aspects of what they said were design flaws, relating to a large traffic infrastructure. X said they were concerned the flaws meant road users and pedestrians, were unnecessarily exposed to hazards.
  2. We will not normally investigate a complaint unless there is good reason to believe that the complainant has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the Council. To satisfy this threshold we would need to be satisfied a person has suffered serious loss, or harm, or distress directly because of the Council’s actions.
  3. Noting X’s concerns about this matter, and the possibility of what may occur in the future, I am not satisfied the alleged fault they cite, has directly caused them a significant injustice. Therefore I will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings