Essex County Council (25 012 596)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint that her property has been damaged by a Council-owned tree. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs B to take the Council to court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complains that parts of her property have been damaged by a Council-owned pavement tree and this was made worse by works done by the Council. Mrs B says the Council has wrongly not accepted liability for the damage and has not investigated the matter properly. Mrs B also says the Council took too long to respond to her claim and replied in a dismissive manner. Mrs B would like the Council to take a range of actions including paying for urgent works to make her wall safe.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not normally investigate complaints about damage to property. This is because ultimately such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent.
  2. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts. Only the courts can decide if an organisation has been negligent and if so, order a party to pay damages. We cannot recommend payments that ‘punish’ an organisation.
  3. I cannot decide whether the Council has been negligent and have no powers to enforce an award of damages. So, I would usually expect someone in Mrs B’s position to seek a remedy in the courts, directly or through her insurers.
  4. I do not consider there is any exceptional reason why Mrs B cannot do this.
  5. So, we will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the damage to her property.
  6. Also, because we are not investigating the substantive matter complained about, an investigation solely into the Council’s handling of Mrs B’s claim would not be a good use of our limited resources or achieve a meaningful outcome for Mrs B.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings