Bristol City Council (25 002 751)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highways maintenance because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to approach the court, which is better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Council has failed to pay her compensation in a claim for damages to recover the costs of repairs to her vehicle after she drove over a pothole in the Council’s area.
  2. Miss Y says she has spent time chasing the issue with the Council and the repairs were costly, causing her financial difficulty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. We cannot determine liability claims for negligence. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  2. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for repairs to her car, which Miss Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. Where the Council has not made payment, if Miss Y wishes to pursue her claim she would need to go to court.
  3. There might be some cost to court action. However, that does not mean it is unreasonable to take court action. There is often financial assistance to those of a low income from HM Courts and Tribunal Service and if Miss Y wishes she can include the cost of going to court in her claim. Also, reasonable adjustments can be made for access to the service if necessary. It is therefore reasonable for Miss Y to be expected to go to court about this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to approach the court, which is better placed.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings