Birmingham City Council (25 000 482)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a highway disrepair issue he says has resulted in damage to his car. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains his car was damaged as a result of defects in the road. He believes the Council is liable for the damage and should pay for any costs he incurs to repair the car. He also believes the Council should take action to repair the road itself.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints about administrative fault. We cannot establish liability in complaints involving damage to property. Claims for damage to property are a matter for the Council’s insurers and, ultimately, for the courts.
  2. Mr X says he has contacted the Council about the damage to his car but not received a response. In this case, if he believes the Council is liable, it would be reasonable for him to make a claim against the Council at court.
  3. Mr X also has concerns about the surface of the road itself and claims the Council is negligent for failing to address the issue.
  4. Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 places a duty on highway authorities to maintain public highways. Highway authorities are expected to routinely monitor the state of highways for which they are responsible and to carry out repairs where necessary.
  5. We cannot interpret the law to say the Council has failed to fulfil its duty; if Mr X believes this to be the case he may follow the process set out at Section 56 of the Highways Act 1980. This allows Mr X to serve notice on the Council and, if it does not act, he may apply to the court for an Order requiring it to carry out repairs. Only the courts may decide whether the Council has fulfilled its statutory obligation so if Mr X wishes to pursue this matter it would be reasonable for him to follow this process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings