Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that his car was damaged by a road defect. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to pursue his compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

The complaint

1. Mr B complains his car was damaged by an exposed metal grid in the middle of the road which the Council had failed to repair. Mr B says the Council has not explained how it inspects exposed grids on the highway and he does not believe this road was inspected properly. Mr B says the Council was wrong to refuse his compensation claim.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
3. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by Mr B.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

6. We do not normally investigate complaints about vehicle damage caused by highway disrepair. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent. We take the view negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.
7. The Council as a local highways authority is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But importantly, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.
8. Also, a local highways authority has a statutory defence if it can show it could not reasonably have been expected to put right a defect before an incident happened.
9. This means the presence of a road defect at the time of an incident is unlikely to be enough on its own to prove negligence.
10. Only the court can decide if the Council has complied with its statutory maintenance duty and whether the Council is entitled to rely on this statutory defence. Also, unlike the courts, we have no powers to enforce an award of damages.
11. So, I would usually expect someone in Mr B’s position to pursue their compensation claim at court.
12. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

13. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman