Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint that the Council is failing to maintain the road which serves her property. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs B to apply to court for an order requiring the Council to repair the road.

The complaint

1. Mrs B complains the Council is failing to maintain the road which serves her property. Mrs B says the condition of the road has damaged vehicles and is making the road unusable for normal vehicles. Mrs B would like the Council to inspect this road and provide a schedule of works to be done including the re-surfacing of the road.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
3. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

6. The Council as a local highways authority has a statutory duty to maintain adopted streets. The Council is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.
7. If a person considers that a highways authority has failed to maintain a highway it is responsible for, the person affected can apply to the magistrates court for an order to be made under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980. This order requires the highways authority to carry out the work needed to the highway.
8. If the highways authority does not respond in time, the person may apply to the crown court for such an order.
9. Mrs B and any other affected residents may use this process to try to get the Council to repair the road. I find it is reasonable for Mrs B to do this. The court is in the best position to decide whether the Council has met its legal duty to maintain the highway. Also, unlike the Ombudsman, the court can order the Council to do the required work.
10. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

11. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman