Transport for London (24 008 122)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about noise on the underground because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Authority has not stopped the noise of the underground after she complained due to the level of noise and vibrations she was experiencing in her property.
  2. Miss Y says the issue stops her from sleeping and means she cannot concentrate or relax in her home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided by and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Railways can lead to a degree of unavoidable noise and disturbance, and this has been recognised in section 122 of the Railways Act 1993. This legislation gives bodies who are acting in the provision of network services, a defence to proceedings for nuisances, such as excessive noise. There is no legal limit for noise on the underground network. As the Authority has such a defence, it is unlikely we would find fault for the level of noise experienced.
  2. Further, the Authority has agreed to complete work to reduce the noise. It has explained why it is currently unable to provide a specific start date to this works and how it prioritises such works based on safety and need. As such it has considered the complaint properly and used its expertise to decide its next steps so we would be unlikely to find fault. As it has considered the complaint and agreed to take appropriate action, we are satisfied with the actions the Authority proposes to take. We will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings