Central Bedfordshire Council (23 020 558)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to Mr X’s car tyre. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to approach the court with his claim.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says a pothole on a road maintained by the Council caused damage to his car tyre and he had to pay for it to be repaired. He would like the Council to reimburse him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council as a local highways authority has a statutory duty to maintain roads. The Council is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.
  2. If a person considers that a highways authority has failed to properly maintain a highway it is responsible for, they can apply to a Magistrates’ court for an order to be made under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980, requiring the authority to take whatever action is needed to bring the highway up to standard.
  3. In terms of Mr X’s claim to cover his repair costs, we would normally expect him to pursue this via the courts. This is because it is essentially a negligence claim, and only the courts can decide if the Council is liable for any damage arising. Further, the courts would have the power to award damages against the Council. The Ombudsman has no such power to enforce an award of damages.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to use the court remedy available to him.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings