London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (23 019 396)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway repair because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council failed to repair the highway outside his home. Mr Y says this has led to him needing to carry out repairs costing him over £7,000 which he would like to be reimbursed with by the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y says he has spent £7,000 to carry out repairs despite having reported the issue on the highway to the Council several times. He started a negligence claim to have the costs paid to him in November 2023.
  2. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  3. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for repairs, which Mr Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts, especially as Mr Y has already begun the claims process. He may also wish to contact his own home insurer about the matter. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings