City of York Council (23 017 432)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about signage because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council has failed to correctly display parking restrictions in his area. This caused Mr Y to believe signs were fake and he parked believing there were no restrictions. He is also unhappy with how the Council responded to his complaint which he believes was unprofessional and caused him upset.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y says the signage he has complained about is defective as the font and display are incorrect. The Council has considered the complaint but said that the signage is correct. I have considered the guidance for traffic signage, which includes both a description and examples of the signage for this type of restriction. The signage appears to comply with the requirements set out in the guidance. Consequently, there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
  2. As we are not investigating the substantive matter, it is not a good use of resources to investigate how the Council dealt with Mr Y’s complaint. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings