Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway maintenance because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

1. Mr Y complained about a lack of highways maintenance near his property boundary, despite requests has caused the damage to the road and flooding. Mr Y says this has caused damage to his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

4. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
5. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for repairs, which Mr Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. It is therefore reasonable for Mr Y to pursue his claim through either his insurer or the courts. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

6. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman