Brighton & Hove City Council (22 005 131)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainant’s personal injury claim. This is because it would have been reasonable for her to pursue the matter in court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that the Council has been at fault in the handling of her personal injury claim and her subsequent complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms B suffered an injury which she contends was caused by the Council’s failure to maintain the highway. She made a claim which the Council placed in the hands of its insurers. The insurers denied that the Council was liable for Ms B’s injury.
  2. Ms B complains that the Council gave false information to the insurer. She also complains that the Council has declined to investigate her subsequent complaint.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint. Essentially, the substantive matter amounts to an allegation that the Council has been negligent, and that this negligence caused Mrs B’s injury. The Ombudsman could not determine whether negligence on the Council’s part means it is liable. Liability can only be definitively determined in court.
  4. Once the Council denied liability, Ms B’s recourse was to pursue the matter in court. Whether to use this recourse was a matter for her and her legal representative. But it would have been reasonable for her to do so in order to establish liability. The Ombudsman will not intervene.
  5. Given that we will not investigate issues around Ms B’s injury, we will not consider the Council’s response to her subsequent complaint. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because it would have been reasonable for her to pursue the matter in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings