Herefordshire Council (21 011 881)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Dec 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to carry out repairs to the road behind his property. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to carry out repairs to the road behind his house, which he says causes noise to his property and those of his neighbours.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 places a duty on highway authorities to maintain public highways. Highway authorities are expected to routinely monitor the state of highways for which they are responsible and to carry out repairs where necessary.
  2. Although the Council’s duty to maintain public highways is set out in law the level of maintenance, frequency of inspections and threshold for repairs is not. It is therefore open to interpretation.
  3. We cannot interpret the law to decide whether the Council has fulfilled its duty; this is a matter for the courts and Section 56 of the Highways Act 1980 provides an alternative remedy for the issue.
  4. If Mr X believes the Council has failed to meet its obligations under the Highways Act 1980 he may serve notice on the Council and, if it does not act, he may apply to the court for an Order requiring it to carry out repairs.
  5. There is no separate, objective or defined standard against which we could judge the Council’s actions on an administrative basis and only the courts may decide whether the Council has fulfilled its statutory obligations. So if Mr X wishes to pursue this matter it would be reasonable for him to follow the process set out above.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to serve notice on the Council and take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings