Essex County Council (20 004 137)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Oct 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate whether injuries suffered by the complainant were caused by the Council’s negligence. This is a matter for the courts to decide.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mrs B, believes the Council is responsible for injuries she suffered when she tripped on the pavement. She asked the Council to pay her compensation but it has denied liability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. It says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mrs B said in her complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs B suffered injuries after she tripped on a broken paving slab. She believes the Council was aware of the defect and is responsible for her injuries because if failed to carry out a repair.
  2. The Council says it inspected the pavement after Mrs B complained but has denied any liability for her injuries.
  3. Mrs B’s complaint is in effect the Council has been negligent. Adjudication on questions of negligence usually involves making decisions on contested questions of fact and law which need the more rigorous and structured procedures of civil litigation for their proper determination. In addition, only a court can decide if a council has been negligent and what damages must be paid.
  4. We cannot decide whether a council has been negligent and have no powers to enforce an award of damages. For this reason, we would usually expect someone in Mrs B’s position to seek a remedy in the courts, directly or through her insurers.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have decided we will not investigate this complaint because it is reasonable for Mrs B to seek a remedy in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings