Westmorland and Furness Council (25 020 822)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway adoption

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to not install a pedestrian crossing outside of a school. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained about road safety outside a local school. She said she is concerned about the safety of her children, children attending the school and drivers. She wants the Council to install a crossing for pedestrians.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y contacted the Council about concerns on the road outside a local school. She said it should install a pedestrian crossing. The school is rurally located, with a limited stretch of pavement outside and no pavement on the opposite road.
  2. The Council explained that due to physical and legal constraints on the road, it could not safely install a crossing on the road. The Council explained that it implemented a 20MPH speed limit outside the school, as well as placing school signs to warn drivers to improve road safety. The Council said it maintains dialogue with the school and will continue to explore alternative measures that may enhance safety.
  3. The Council considered Mrs Y’s complaint, completed an assessment and clearly explained its reasons for being unable to install a pedestrian crossing. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions, and we are unable to achieve the outcome Mrs Y wants. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings