Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (26 016 466)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delays by the Council when it considered Miss X’s planning application. This is because it is reasonable to expect her to have used her right of appeal, and it is not proportionate to investigate complaint handling on its own.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about delays by the Council when it considered her planning application. She also says it has not replied to her complaint. Miss X says this has caused significant stress, delays in building work and added costs. Miss X wants the Council to provide compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council did not determine Miss X’s planning application within eight weeks. Once that period expired, Miss X had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate against the Council’s failure to determine the application. It would have been reasonable for her to use that right.
  2. We will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling as a separate matter. It is not a proportionate use of public resources to investigate complaint handling where we are not investigating the substantive issue complained about.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it was reasonable to expect her to have used her right of appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings