Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
London Borough of Wandsworth (24 015 929)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to carry out a satisfactory consultation for a proposed housing development where the Ms X lives. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.
-
Sevenoaks District Council (24 016 309)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council processed and considered planning applications for a site next to Mr & Mrs Y’s home. Nor in the way it considered their reports of noise nuisance. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. Also, we do not consider they suffered a significant personal injustice when a planning officer suggested they were too late to seek judicial review of a planning decision.
-
Rutland County Council (24 017 379)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.
-
Stafford Borough Council (24 019 780)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 11-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the complainant has not suffered significant injustice.
-
South Holland District Council (24 003 168)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 11-Mar-2025
Summary: Miss X complains about the way the Council has dealt with and taken enforcement action against a breach of planning control at a neighbouring property. We found no evidence of fault in the way the Council has considered these matters. We found fault in the way the Council responded to Miss X’s complaints causing her an injustice through her time and trouble in pursuing a complaint. We have recommended a suitable remedy for the injustice caused in this case.
-
North Warwickshire Borough Council (24 017 565)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 10-Mar-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his planning application. This is because Mr X has appealed against the Council’s decision to refuse the application.
-
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (24 017 910)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and the complainant has not suffered significant injustice.
-
Wakefield City Council (24 019 498)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
North West Leicestershire District Council (24 017 114)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 06-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council did not properly publicise a planning application or respond to concerns. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant further investigation.
-
South Kesteven District Council (24 018 775)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 06-Mar-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault. The complainant has also not suffered significant injustice because of the alleged fault.