Dacorum Borough Council (25 001 140)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to decline to determine the complainant’s planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X has complained about the Council’s decision to decline to determine his planning application. Mr X says the Council’s actions have left him unable to develop his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A local planning authority can decline to determine a planning application in certain circumstances under the Town and Country Planning Act. This includes when a similar application has previously been refused for the site or if an appeal against the refusal is pending with the Planning Inspector.
  2. In this case, the Council has declined to determine Mr X’s planning application. Mr X says he has made changes to the proposal and the amended application addresses the reasons for refusing the previous application for the site.
  3. However, I am satisfied the Council has explained why the amended application is similar to the previous development and why it considers there have been no material changes. I understand Mr X disagrees, but the Council was entitled to use its professional judgement in this regard. As the Council properly considered if it should decline to determine the application it is unlikely I would find fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings