Fenland District Council (25 000 522)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions leading to a retrospective planning application for work to a listed war memorial. We do not consider the complainant has suffered a significant personal injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council:
    • Failed to apply for Listed Building Consent until works to a listed war memorial were practically complete.
    • Failed to consult with concerned parties and provided incorrect information which is then contradicted.
    • Failed to respect the war memorial.
  2. Mr X says the Council’s actions have caused him to lose faith and response in the Planning department and officers involved in the scheme.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and information on the Council’s website.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council applied for retrospective listed building consent to replace the steps leading up to a war memorial in the town where Mr X lives.
  1. The planning pages of the Council’s website show Mr X commented on the application but did not object to the proposed work. The website also shows no organisation objected to the work.
  2. Listed Building consent was granted for the work.
  3. I understand Mr X is dissatisfied with the process the Council followed and its initial responses to his enquiries. However, I do not consider he has suffered a significant personal injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because I do not consider he has suffered a significant personal injustice because of the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings