Darlington Borough Council (24 011 485)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her planning application. This is because Mrs X has used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector and we cannot investigate any complaint about the Council’s actions as part of her appeal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains about the Council’s handling of her planning application. She says council officers gave incorrect information to the planning committee and the Planning Inspector to influence the outcome of her application, refused to remove a member of staff from the case, failed to consider new information and did not properly deal with her ‘freedom of information’ request.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Because Mrs X has appealed against the Council’s decision to refuse her planning application we cannot investigate any complaint about the Council’s handling of the application itself. We also cannot investigate the Council’s actions as part of Mrs X’s appeal. If Mrs X had concerns about the information provided by the Council she should have raised this with the Planning Inspector.
  2. Mrs X is clearly unhappy with the way the Council dealt with her ‘freedom of information’ request but it would be reasonable for her to take this matter to the Information Commissioner. They are the experts in these matters and are better placed to decide whether the Council complied with its obligations.
  3. While Mrs X is also unhappy about the way the Council dealt with her complaint, the courts have said that where we cannot investigate a complaint about the main or underlying issue, we cannot normally investigate related issues either. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration in England [2006] EWHC 2847 (Admin)). So, where the substance of a complaint is not subject to investigation, the Ombudsman does not investigate the Council’s handling of the issue in isolation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mrs X has used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and we cannot investigate what happened as part of her appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings