Canterbury City Council (24 005 675)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the way the Council determined the complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant exercised a right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate in relation to the issues raised. The law says we cannot investigate in these circumstances.

The complaint

  1. The complainant (Mr Z) is making a complaint about how the Council determined his planning application. He says the Council refused to grant him planning permission which meant he had to lodge an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. Further, Mr Z explains the Planning Inspectorate found the Council had failed to properly hear and assess his application and did not correctly apply its policies.
  2. In summary, Mr Z complains on the basis of the adverse findings identified by the Planning Inspectorate. He says the alleged failings caused significant and unnecessary delay. As a desired outcome, Mr Z wants the Council to be held accountable for the issues raised and to provide a sum of financial compensation to serve as acknowledge of the losses he has incurred.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Planning Inspectorate acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister and considers appeals about planning matters, including delays and a decision to refuse permission. I recognise the points Mr Z makes, but the issues raised overlap entirely with those considered by an appeal body which acts on behalf of a Government minister. The law says we have no jurisdiction to investigate where the complainant has exercised a right of appeal in these circumstances. The restriction I outline at paragraph three (above) therefore applies.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot by investigate this complaint. This is because the complainant has exercised a right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate in relation to the issues raised. The law says we cannot investigate in these circumstances.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings