Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (24 003 705)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a planning refusal because an appeal to the Planning Inspector has been used.

The complaint

  1. Mr X made a planning application for an extension which was refused. Mr X appealed to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X submitted a planning application for an extension with help from an agent. The Council refused the planning application and Mr X appealed to the Planning Inspector. Mr X says that the Council did not communicate properly with him and took too long to determine the matter.
  2. The Council says that they communicated with the agent as Mr X did not specify that he wanted direct discussions with the Council. The Council points out that a pre planning application advice service is offered but was not in this case taken up.
  3. Mr X’s appeal to the Planning Inspector means that the complaint is out of jurisdiction and so the Ombudsman cannot investigate this matter. Any complaint about delay could also have been appealed to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he appealed to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings