Guildford Borough Council (23 016 849)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector. It is unlikely we would find fault in relation to the remaining issues complained about.

The complaint

  1. Ms X has complained about how the Council dealt with her planning application and says there was a delay before planning permission was granted.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.
  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector after eight weeks if she was unhappy with how long the Council was taking to determine her application. I consider it would have been reasonable for Ms X to have used her right to appeal. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.
  2. Ms X says the Council should refund the planning application fee she paid due to the delays. Under the Planning Guarantee, local planning authorities must refund planning fees if an application is not determined within a specified time and if no extension has been agreed in writing. The circumstances in this case do not meet the requirements for a refund under the Planning Guarantee. I am also satisfied the Council properly considered Ms X’s request for a refund and explained why the planning fee will not be returned.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector. It is unlikely we would find fault in relation to the remaining issues complained about.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings