Somerset Council (23 001 587)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we cannot achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains about the Council failed to properly consider the impact of her neighbour’s planning application. She says the development impacts on her enjoyment of her property and reduces light levels to her garden. She considers the development is overbearing, out of keeping with the area and inappropriate. She wants the Council to remove part of the development approved and carry out alterations to the remaining part.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the planning application documents available online.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I understand Ms X does not agree with the Council’s decision to grant planning permission but we are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  2. I have reviewed the planning officer’s report and this summarises residents’ objections to the proposal and shows the Council considered the impact of the development but decided it was acceptable. The officer’s view is a matter of professional judgement and I have seen no basis for us to criticise it. We cannot therefore say the decision was wrong.
  3. We also cannot achieve the outcome Ms X wants as the development has already been built and we have no power to force the neighbour to alter it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we cannot achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings