Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (22 017 723)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Apr 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning permission granted by the Council because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council improperly granted planning permission for a neighbouring building as the planning applicant was an employee of the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that the Council granted planning permission in 2017 for a separation of a neighbouring building into separate business area. She says that there is a condition which requires that a bin area had to be created for one of the businesses but this was not enforced by the Council.
  2. She complained to the Council that a further planning application had been submitted where the applicant was not the owner and was related to a Council employee.
  3. The Council replied stating that they were satisfied by the ownership statement but, ultimately, any ownership dispute is a private matter. The Council added that a Council employee is entitled to make a planning application but, where the applicant is related or known to the Council’s Planning department or other senior officers, the planning application has to be considered by the Planning Committee.
  4. I am satisfied that the Council properly considered the planning application. In the absence of fault, the Ombudsman cannot question the merits of the planning permission decision itself.
  5. The issue of enforcement was not part of the complaint considered by the Council and therefore is premature. If Ms X is unhappy with the Council’s response on this separate matter she may make a further complaint to this office.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings