Torbay Council (22 012 596)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application. This is because the impact of the development is not enough to cause Mr X significant injustice and it is unlikely we could say the Council should have refused the application or sought the changes Mr X would have liked.

The complaint

  • The complainant, Mr X, complains about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application and his complaint. He says the development significantly impacts his amenities, in particular his privacy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code. I also considered the planning application documents including the approved plans and the planning officer’s report.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. While it is clear Mr X has suffered some impact from his neighbour’s development this is not enough to amount to a significant injustice and does not further investigation. It is also unlikely we could say the decision would or should have been different.
  3. Mr X is also unhappy with the way the Council dealt with his complaint. But it is not a good use of public resources to look at the Council’s complaints handling if we are not going to look at the substantive issue complained about. We will not therefore investigate this issue separately.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the impact of the development which forms the basis of Mr X’s complaint is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings